Author |
Topic: Ranger Class Discussion (Read 3482 times) |
|
Claw
Guest
|
 |
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #40 on: 12/23/03 at 01:39:45 » |
 Quote
|
ok I will. Now how about you shut your stupid mouth fool.
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
Kazul
Full Member
Don't speak, just let people assume your dumb.
Gender: 
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #41 on: 12/29/03 at 17:37:39 » |
Quote
|
rangers used to be a bit overpowered, but they lowered their accuracy and damage, i used to do 90's w/my human rangers, now 60's-70's w/o enhance. You don't know what your talking about, just cause a certain class kicks ur a$$ doesn't mean they need to be changed. Maybe it just means you suck.
|
|
IP Logged |
If you can't think of anything truly worth saying, you'd be just like the othere 99.9% of the population.
|
|
|
Celerity
Full Member
Full offence intended.
Gender:
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #42 on: 12/29/03 at 21:13:09 » |
Quote
|
Indeed. Rangers used to be hardly ever used and the few that were around were less than great. Then there was a huge change in the class and they became basically the best class-along came the armies of lvl 30 rangers. After being slightly toned down to what they are now they seem pretty good, but not overpowered.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Snowy
Full Member
Freeze, aint it?
Gender:
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #43 on: 01/28/04 at 20:25:28 » |
Quote
|
Yeah, leave them the way they are. They're not overpowered. Only classes that need work are mages & fighters oh.. and maybe take away zerkers 6th stam (by the way, delete pacis)
|
|
IP Logged |
Contact 'Snowy' in game.
|
|
|
Xcelon
Full Member
You think I'm wierd? Go take a look in the mirror!
Gender:
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #44 on: 02/02/04 at 12:31:46 » |
Quote
|
I think that rangers are given to much power, when they get to archie they are unstoppable. I think that they're power should be limited. 
|
|
IP Logged |
~Xcelon~Ajimoo~Slovak~Remake~Atlanta~ In Game.
|
|
|
alone
Full Member
My beautiful escape. Fall from pain. My suicide.
Gender:
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #45 on: 02/02/04 at 13:25:21 » |
Quote
|
Rangers are in no way unstoppable.. Against other arch crits, they're not that great.. And compaired to the abilities of a Druid (if both are used to their full potential), I don't think a Ranger would stand much of a chance.
The main reason I keep some Rangers is due to them being so useful at most bosses, other than that Thieves can everything I need.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Everlast
Nightmist Game Staff
Full Member
Örïgïnål Prånk§tër
Gender:
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #46 on: 02/04/04 at 06:50:34 » |
Quote
|
True.
Rangers have too much armor in my opinion though---that is the only thing i see as overpowered about them.
They help a lot at bosses...rangers/zerkers with spells would be my pick over any other class to use at bosses. They're good for pking..but theives are better. Thieves can come invis without a mage casting invis on your whole party, and they do not need spells to be absolutly devestating.
|
|
IP Logged |
Everlast is the voice of reason, take heed, take heed. -Deval Feb. 4, 2004
Find me on Gaddy.
|
|
|
Xcelon
Full Member
You think I'm wierd? Go take a look in the mirror!
Gender:
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #47 on: 02/09/04 at 11:24:57 » |
Quote
|
But they use shields How can ya pull an arrow, hold a bow and hold a shield at the same time? Its just not posibble 
|
|
IP Logged |
~Xcelon~Ajimoo~Slovak~Remake~Atlanta~ In Game.
|
|
|
Issy
Full Member
I am Alpha and Omega; the first and the last
   
Gender:
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #48 on: 02/10/04 at 10:53:54 » |
Quote
|
on 02/09/04 at 11:24:57, Xcelon wrote:| But they use shields How can ya pull an arrow, hold a bow and hold a shield at the same time? Its just not posibble |
|
Thats been argued before. I made the example of the shields used in LoTR, when the orcs were attacking frodo and his part. They had shields that slid over their forearm and when pulling back the bow, would no-way hinder the shot. (In realistic terms(for the bow hunters) it would infact hinder the shot alittle)
Taking away shields on a ranger would just be bad karma.
|
|
IP Logged |
And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.
|
|
|
alone
Full Member
My beautiful escape. Fall from pain. My suicide.
Gender:
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #49 on: 02/10/04 at 11:17:25 » |
Quote
|
Was it ever said Stances would be put in at some stage? Or was it just left? Cus if they were to be put in, Defencive - Shield up (meaning you get the protection, but can't shoot). Offensive - Shield by your side (so no protection, and able to shoot)
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Deval
Full Member
What one lacks in skill, he makes up for with alts
 
Gender:
|
|
Re: Ranger Class Discussion
« Reply #50 on: 02/16/04 at 00:35:28 » |
Quote
|
Stances were suggested for fighters.
|
|
IP Logged |
'Madness you say! Do you fear me? Are you afraid of what I might do, of what I might say? What a fascinating reaction. Don't you find it somewhat encumbering?'
|
|
|
|
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Member Map 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print