Jump to content


Smidgen

Member Since 07 May 2007
Offline Last Active Mar 12 2009 12:19 PM
-----

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Possibly Selling These Not Looking For Too Much On Most...

07 January 2008 - 01:56 AM

Smidgen and the 2x Black Sapphires Sold

In Topic: Small Question

16 July 2007 - 04:49 AM

Many people complained of the high cost of mage damage spells.

Lowering the cost of the damage spells is why the invis and camo spells were upped, to keep their mana costs decently balanced.
Until you've come up with a real problem that this causes or the sort, I don't understand pursuing a complaint about the cost of invis/camo.


Just curious but if "lowering the cost of damage is why the invis and camo spells were upped"
(see entire quote above) how come the cost of stormwrath and/or nature's fury was not lowered as well? I mean if now blast only costs 7mp and beam only cost 10mp, but invis increased on mages.. then how come stormwrath still costs 10 mp and nature's fury still cost 15 mp along with camo going up by 25mp when mages invis only went up by 20mp (and yes I know that camo should cost more because it lasts longer but it now cost double what it did and 5mp more than mages invis yet neither of the dmg spells were reduced)? Don't get me wrong I'm not saying this is a totally bad thing or that its unfair, I don't really have an opinion yet until someone explains to me the reasoning. It might make perfect sense once I am enlightened, and it really doesn't bother me much I am just curious. I get the general idea of the increasing of invis and lowering of dmg spells just wondered why both classes dmg spell costs were not lowered. So, if someone could please explain that to me it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.