Jump to content


Photo

Fighter Ability?


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Mec

Mec
  • Members
  • 602 posts

Posted 26 June 2004 - 05:31 PM

Well, I just read this other fighter post and I'm like, yeah, it would be neat to have a small, insignificant, fighter ability.

The ability would be called sidestep. The idea is that when being attacked with a weapon, except for bows, the fighter would sidestep and stick out his foot, causing the attacker to lose a stamina, and hurt himself for the damage he would normally do to the fighter. The formula?

Sidestep takes all the remaining stamina of the fighter, no less than 2. If the next attack on a fighter hits, then sidestep does nothing. If its a miss, than the attacker loses 1 stamina and does that damage to him/herself.

This would be useless towards pacifists (duh), most effective versus berserkers and theives, less affective toward mages and rangers, and might be useful against clerics and paladins.

I think that this would make this game more strategy and less micromanaging. It might be useful in some places, but it could cost you a battle. What do you think?

#2 Crane

Crane

    "Teh Gareth!"

  • Members
  • 4091 posts

Posted 26 June 2004 - 07:44 PM

I feel that Fighters should be the class that remains ability-less. It is one of the things that makes them unique, their simplicity.
The Crane Temple Chairman

Main crits:
Crane
Europa


Don't kill the messenger mathematician!

#3 Mec

Mec
  • Members
  • 602 posts

Posted 26 June 2004 - 07:53 PM

Their boringness you mean? I think they should be a 'strategy-class' where how carefully and cleverly you handle them is how powerful they are.

#4 Cule

Cule
  • Members
  • 762 posts

Posted 09 July 2004 - 05:39 PM

/nod crane

#5 Maximas

Maximas
  • Members
  • 144 posts

Posted 22 August 2004 - 01:58 AM

I agree with Crane.
blah!

#6 joanna

joanna
  • Members
  • 764 posts

Posted 22 August 2004 - 08:41 AM

theres something wrong with my fighters lately
they always used to be able to round an archzerk when fully spelled, now they struggle to hit over 70 each time

i thought the mage beam update was supposed to make fighters stonger?

#7 Rappy_Ninja

Rappy_Ninja
  • Members
  • 2923 posts

Posted 22 August 2004 - 03:54 PM

as suggested 900 times before


ADD STANCES
Page/Memo Beatrix

#8 dec

dec
  • Members
  • 371 posts

Posted 27 October 2004 - 10:15 PM

theres something wrong with my fighters lately
they always used to be able to round an archzerk when fully spelled, now they struggle to hit over 70 each time

i thought the mage beam update was supposed to make fighters stonger?

with only enhance my fighter with 25 str can usually hit for about 75-90
Roses are red
Violets are blue
In Soviet Russia
Poem write you!


Belzabar in-game

#9 Rappy_Ninja

Rappy_Ninja
  • Members
  • 2923 posts

Posted 30 October 2004 - 06:20 PM

I feel that Fighters should be the class that remains ability-less. It is one of the things that makes them unique, their simplicity.

nice so their unique ability is being horrible and weakest class

nice...
Page/Memo Beatrix

#10 Sean

Sean
  • Members
  • 976 posts

Posted 31 October 2004 - 01:14 PM

lol theyre cheap thats the ability.
Stadic Ingame...

#11 .?.

.?.
  • Members
  • 1210 posts

Posted 01 November 2004 - 10:27 AM

they should get bonus's off items IMO

Like extra damage, they equip a halberd, instead of 25 base, they get an extra one, leeding to 26 seeing as there masters with weapons
Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for You are with me.

#12 Sean

Sean
  • Members
  • 976 posts

Posted 05 November 2004 - 11:00 PM

they should get bonus's off items IMO

Like extra damage, they equip a halberd, instead of 25 base, they get an extra one, leeding to 26 seeing as there masters with weapons

Sounds good make your own thread about it itl get more attention.
Stadic Ingame...




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users