Jump to content


Photo

Shields...


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

Poll: Should rangers be able to use shields? (89 member(s) have cast votes)

Should rangers be able to use shields?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#31 Crane

Crane

    "Teh Gareth!"

  • Members
  • 4091 posts

Posted 09 January 2005 - 07:58 PM

It would mean bringing out some new bracers though, maybe... anything with "Shield" in the name would give a chance-to-hit loss.

I would still prefer Rangers not to be able to use the larger shields at all, with the exception of the Shield of Faith and Feathered Shield, maybe.
The Crane Temple Chairman

Main crits:
Crane
Europa


Don't kill the messenger mathematician!

#32 deadman

deadman
  • Members
  • 2395 posts

Posted 14 January 2005 - 03:17 AM

should just leave them the way they are the world isnt perfect u know
Contact Unforgiven on 1a.

#33 Ryuku

Ryuku

    Ryuku Ingame, Best 3v3er ever

  • Members
  • 2003 posts

Posted 14 January 2005 - 06:01 AM

Elven Bracer with this idea pwnts (Cranes alternive SoF item)

#34 Azza

Azza
  • Members
  • 235 posts

Posted 05 January 2006 - 05:56 PM

I thought the idea of rangers are they are faster and easier to move around therfore they dont use much armour as it slows them down. (im guessing that rangers = archers irl) so if oyu look at alot of pictures of archers they dont have much armour on them at all

#35 Evergrey

Evergrey
  • Members
  • 380 posts

Posted 17 January 2006 - 09:00 AM

http://www.nightmist...;num=1043717456
ass, cretin, dimwit, dumb ass, dunce, fool, halfwit, ignoramus, imbecile, jackass, jerk, moron, ninny, nitwit, pinhead, simpleton, stupid, twit, Idiot

#36 Torak Jr

Torak Jr
  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 23 May 2006 - 11:35 PM

I pretty much had to laugh while reading some of these post. I would just like to add that if we are going for realistic then why cant i be two squares away and make a ranged attack on someone? I mean after all a bow is a ranged weapon not a melee weapon. Also why is it that i dont ever have to buy any arrows... Im not saying that Rangers should be allowed the biggest baddest shield in the game but I do have to shoot down the bracer idea, for i can see it now...

No1Ranger: has equiped his elven bracers of master archery.
No1Ranger: Ha Ha attack me now mrbeserk.
mrbeserk attacked No1Ranger with an oak staff breaking his wrist and causing him to never be able to draw a bow again becasue he was stupid enough to attack with a bow from 4 feet away!

A ranger should (imo) be able to Equip a small shield such as a buckler which would be strapped to his forearm. Well thats really all i guess.

#37 Bahashabeem

Bahashabeem
  • Members
  • 240 posts

Posted 24 May 2006 - 12:08 AM

I cannot support this idea for the fact that I said this a long time ago. But hey o well its just a game and adds defense for the ranger to make things fair. Its not like a fighter could swing or thrust a weapon 6 times at his full strength anyway with a shield. Its a ficticious game where mages whoop people with bludgent weapons and sharp swords. Not like a fighter could even hit a ranger anyway with a bow and all would be alot of space in between them. Suppose I am just saying let some things stay as they are for changing them now only makes more people unhappy. But give rangers a new bow that actually has a better attack base ;) Now thats an idea!!!!
Its what you do when no one is looking that determines what kinda person you really are!! ~~NBM lives on through me!

#38 Redheart

Redheart
  • Members
  • 653 posts

Posted 25 May 2006 - 11:52 PM

We love Bahashabeem ;)
" For lunch we can have cupcakes until our little fairy tummies are content. We can all stay up to watch the sunset, then go to sleep in our little fairy beds.”




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users