Jump to content


Photo

1-alt Update Response From A Concerned Player


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 Esellesar

Esellesar
  • Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 02 August 2011 - 05:21 AM

Compromise is what we need. A balance, so to speak. The newest update applied to Nightmist is severely out of touch with how the game has been played, is played, and should be played. However, our past system was quite terrible in its own right. The point is neither one is perfect because neither is balanced. I believe we need to change our path of thinking on both sides of the argument which leads me to this.

No classes (0!) should be nerfed from our old system. Each of the weaker classes that were buffed in this update should receive a buff to be equal to the classes that were nerfed in this update. Difficult to understand, let me be a little more clear and specific. The classes that were nerfed, listed alphabetically not according to how screwed, (Berserker, Cleric, Druid, Ranger, Thief). Now for the classes that were buffed, alphabetically once more, (Fighters, Mages, Paladins). My proposal is to simply buff the weaker classes while doing absolutely nothing to the classes that were nerfed. Now, as staff figuring out the specifics of the necessary buffs to create this equality amongst races and classes is your job. We the players tested for said equality and it is completely non-existent.

Also, I would be inclined to believe it would take far less work and effort to edit 3 classes than completely remake a game which is what Staff has done with the newest update.

Thank you,

Sawyer

-Note to Staff, if you were this worried about PvM (PvE or w/e you want to call it), instead of nerfing our characters to make the game longer and more difficult, you could have avoided much more headache from the player base if you would have done things right and just increased hp and attacks for monsters. Or, you could allow the players to do something which is responsible for the recent hike in activity, (Bosses).






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users